Week 2
I was reminded of the term ‘apostasy’ within Thoreau's essay Walking. He is encouraging the unification of humans and a natural life without restriction from religion, tradition, authority, and society. Apostasy is the abandonment of religious belief, and I believe through this essay, Thoreau is saying that instead of conventional religion we should look to the ‘wild’.
Thoreau believes civilization and productivity are the main threats in our lives. I align more with Solnit’s belief that erasure, forgetting, and domination are the main threats that walking can mitigate. The presence of a threat can motivate people to do anything, beyond the limits of societal regulations. Thoreau’s threats are self imposed, created in his head but embodied through 19th century human behavior. A lot of his justifications for prioritizing solitude, intellectuality, and challenging stimuli through nature comes from his motivation to be counter cultural, and dissolve the threat of conformity.
An interesting perspective on the question of what walkers are rejecting - civilization/culture/society (Thoreau) or forgetting (Solnit). There's a fascinating tension here that I hope we can continue to explore.
ReplyDelete